<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Should PN upgrade to a new forum ?? in Community Site Feedback</title>
    <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Community-Site-Feedback/Should-PN-upgrade-to-a-new-forum/m-p/1088856#M6296</link>
    <description>As O'Riley stated&lt;BR /&gt;[quote=http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/networking/news/slb_0301.html] So, if the load balancer is only a small part of a bigger whole, &lt;B&gt;why does it get blamed so disproportionately?&lt;/B&gt; What is it about load balancers that attracts critics, finger pointers, and naysayers alike? Let's take a look at some of the reasons.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;B&gt;The Blame Game&lt;/B&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;One reason why people blame server load balancers is that they often do experience more problems with them than with other network devices. There are several reasons for this, but the primary one is that of all the network devices a site might employ, load balancers are typically the newest on the scene. Moreover, manufacturers are competing with each other at a feverish pace. They quickly release new feature-rich versions that aren't thoroughly tested.&lt;BR /&gt;Another reason for the blame is that load balancers are not very well understood. Documentation quality varies greatly from vendor to vendor, and there are few third-party resources (O'Reilly and I hope to change that). A load balancer may not be malfunctioning, but if the people configuring the unit don't understand all of the features or troubleshooting techniques, they may unduly lay blame on the load balancer. The old maxim that people fear (and blame) what they don't understand certainly applies here.&lt;BR /&gt;Load balancers are also in the direct path of all traffic to a particular Web site. By looking at Figure 2 below, you can see that if the load balancer stops working, the entire site stops working. This critical position in the infrastructure can make it appear as though the load balancer is the problem, even in cases where it is not (such as a firewall issue, a back-end database problem, someone tripping over a cable, etc.). Unlike a broken or malfunctioning Web server, a misconfigured or malfunctioning load balancer will result in a dead-to-the-world site. This is why a firewall is often a suspect, too, but to a lesser degree since it is generally a simpler device than load balancers.[/quote</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2014 00:00:37 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>TORPC</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-04-23T00:00:37Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Should PN upgrade to a new forum ??</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Community-Site-Feedback/Should-PN-upgrade-to-a-new-forum/m-p/1088808#M6248</link>
      <description>Despite Plusnet trying to fix this broken ancient forum&lt;BR /&gt;Should PlusNet upgrade to a new forum ?&lt;img class="lia-deferred-image lia-image-emoji" src="https://community.plus.net/html/@3681646702FDFD32BCA97E2E5F1BDDD5/images/emoticons/huh.gif" alt="Huh" title="Huh" /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2014 18:04:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Community-Site-Feedback/Should-PN-upgrade-to-a-new-forum/m-p/1088808#M6248</guid>
      <dc:creator>TORPC</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-04-18T18:04:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Should PN upgrade to a new forum ??</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Community-Site-Feedback/Should-PN-upgrade-to-a-new-forum/m-p/1088809#M6249</link>
      <description>I have made a different suggestion&lt;BR /&gt;Archive a lot of old posts - it is 7 years since we had a general archive action and move the archive to a separate server not accessible by posters&lt;BR /&gt;This would drastically reduce the size of the forum and the associated database&lt;BR /&gt;I haven't had an answer but I believe the effect is being looked into</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2014 18:15:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Community-Site-Feedback/Should-PN-upgrade-to-a-new-forum/m-p/1088809#M6249</guid>
      <dc:creator>Oldjim</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-04-18T18:15:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Should PN upgrade to a new forum ??</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Community-Site-Feedback/Should-PN-upgrade-to-a-new-forum/m-p/1088810#M6250</link>
      <description>It may work, &lt;BR /&gt;however a fresh base wouldn't go a miss</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2014 18:33:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Community-Site-Feedback/Should-PN-upgrade-to-a-new-forum/m-p/1088810#M6250</guid>
      <dc:creator>TORPC</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-04-18T18:33:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Should PN upgrade to a new forum ??</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Community-Site-Feedback/Should-PN-upgrade-to-a-new-forum/m-p/1088811#M6251</link>
      <description>As I remember the last time the Forum was completely rejigged I really don't want to be around if it is moved to a new server(s) and up to date software</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2014 18:36:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Community-Site-Feedback/Should-PN-upgrade-to-a-new-forum/m-p/1088811#M6251</guid>
      <dc:creator>Oldjim</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-04-18T18:36:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Should PN upgrade to a new forum ??</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Community-Site-Feedback/Should-PN-upgrade-to-a-new-forum/m-p/1088812#M6252</link>
      <description>Moving to a new forum will be no easy task.&amp;nbsp; Like OldJim, I was around and on the periphery of the new Community Forum site and to achieve the functionality and integration with the Member Centre and the main blog page was a massive effort.&amp;nbsp;  As a result the current system is almost certainly befuddled by legacy integration issues between Wordpress and SMF.&amp;nbsp; Making changes risks bringing even greater problems into focus.&lt;BR /&gt;As a starter for 10 OldJim's proposal for an archive of many of the old posts now redundant boards and then a tidy-up on the tables should make a big improvement&amp;nbsp; ---- BUT.&amp;nbsp; There be dragons down in them dark tunnels.&amp;nbsp; Not a task to be tackled lightly or in haste.&lt;BR /&gt;Longer term a fresh look at the whole back office infrastructure needs to be carried out, but would a User Forum in its current format survive the financial review? &lt;BR /&gt;Maurice&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2014 20:44:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Community-Site-Feedback/Should-PN-upgrade-to-a-new-forum/m-p/1088812#M6252</guid>
      <dc:creator>MauriceC</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-04-18T20:44:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Should PN upgrade to a new forum ??</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Community-Site-Feedback/Should-PN-upgrade-to-a-new-forum/m-p/1088813#M6253</link>
      <description>Voted 'No' as there isn't a 'None of my business, it's completely up to PN' option...&amp;nbsp; &lt;img class="lia-deferred-image lia-image-emoji" src="https://community.plus.net/html/@0FA1396AC0773F33E2DC472BB4F75D3C/images/emoticons/wink.gif" alt="Wink" title="Wink" /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2014 21:10:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Community-Site-Feedback/Should-PN-upgrade-to-a-new-forum/m-p/1088813#M6253</guid>
      <dc:creator>pwatson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-04-18T21:10:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Should PN upgrade to a new forum ??</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Community-Site-Feedback/Should-PN-upgrade-to-a-new-forum/m-p/1088814#M6254</link>
      <description>'Undecided' is my vote.&lt;BR /&gt;Love the forums except for slowness and 'posing with attachment' issues.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2014 23:07:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Community-Site-Feedback/Should-PN-upgrade-to-a-new-forum/m-p/1088814#M6254</guid>
      <dc:creator>w23</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-04-18T23:07:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Should PN upgrade to a new forum ??</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Community-Site-Feedback/Should-PN-upgrade-to-a-new-forum/m-p/1088815#M6255</link>
      <description>No one as cited the issues which need to be fixed to justify change.&lt;BR /&gt;Change consumes resources - money and time - which arguably if available should be spent on other more important matters - eg SSL for email.&lt;BR /&gt;If it ain't broken don't try fixing it seems an appropriate maxim here!&lt;BR /&gt;All databases need periodic maintenance - table tidying, index restructure etc... - one hopes this is implemented and performed on a regular basis?</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2014 07:40:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Community-Site-Feedback/Should-PN-upgrade-to-a-new-forum/m-p/1088815#M6255</guid>
      <dc:creator>Townman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-04-19T07:40:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Should PN upgrade to a new forum ??</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Community-Site-Feedback/Should-PN-upgrade-to-a-new-forum/m-p/1088816#M6256</link>
      <description>I do think the forum is looking a little dated, and could do with being brought in to 2014, but if it took funds away from other projects, then I would rather it stay as it is.&lt;BR /&gt;I voted YES though.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2014 12:42:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Community-Site-Feedback/Should-PN-upgrade-to-a-new-forum/m-p/1088816#M6256</guid>
      <dc:creator>Devonian</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-04-19T12:42:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Should PN upgrade to a new forum ??</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Community-Site-Feedback/Should-PN-upgrade-to-a-new-forum/m-p/1088817#M6257</link>
      <description>Why oh!!! why.... do people think it will cost the earth ..........&lt;BR /&gt;There are latest versions of &lt;A href="http://www.simplemachines.org/" target="_blank"&gt;SMF that are Free&lt;/A&gt; even update(s)&lt;BR /&gt;There are also other free forum maker(s) available therefore the cost(s) can be kept to a minimum, towards the staff(s) wages&lt;BR /&gt;PN already have the server(s)&lt;BR /&gt;Research my friends research&lt;BR /&gt;We all know that PN are up against it whilst trying to sort the issues, that comes with such an old / modified forum base, with old standard(s) of coding, new browser rendering et al&lt;BR /&gt;However, that said&lt;BR /&gt;New standard(s) of coding are clearly here&lt;BR /&gt;Think of it as a long overdue spring clean &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;TABLE&gt;&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Quote&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt; Powered by SMF | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC &lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt; 2006 -2014 = 8 years = time for a revamp</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2014 14:40:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Community-Site-Feedback/Should-PN-upgrade-to-a-new-forum/m-p/1088817#M6257</guid>
      <dc:creator>TORPC</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-04-19T14:40:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Should PN upgrade to a new forum ??</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Community-Site-Feedback/Should-PN-upgrade-to-a-new-forum/m-p/1088818#M6258</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;TABLE&gt;&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Quote from: TORPC&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Why oh!!! why.... do people think it will cost the earth ..........&lt;BR /&gt;There are latest versions of &lt;A href="http://www.simplemachines.org/" target="_blank"&gt;SMF that are Free&lt;/A&gt; even update(s)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;As I pointed out earlier,&amp;nbsp; it isn't the base cost of the Forum software that takes time (and the implied cost!)&amp;nbsp; it's the integration with the other Plusnet facilies that make the task quite complex&amp;nbsp; - and a real beast to test..&lt;BR /&gt;M</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2014 15:09:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Community-Site-Feedback/Should-PN-upgrade-to-a-new-forum/m-p/1088818#M6258</guid>
      <dc:creator>MauriceC</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-04-19T15:09:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Should PN upgrade to a new forum ??</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Community-Site-Feedback/Should-PN-upgrade-to-a-new-forum/m-p/1088819#M6259</link>
      <description>Compare these forums with the &lt;A href="http://www.simplemachines.org/community/index.php" target="_blank"&gt;Simple Machines Community Forums&lt;/A&gt; (the creators of this forum software):&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;TABLE&gt;&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Plusnet Community Forums&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Simple Machines Community Forums&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Total Members&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&lt;CENTER&gt;25,412&lt;/CENTER&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&lt;CENTER&gt;333,297&lt;/CENTER&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Most users online ever&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&lt;CENTER&gt;838&lt;/CENTER&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&lt;CENTER&gt;3,726&lt;/CENTER&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Total topics&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&lt;CENTER&gt;124,291&lt;/CENTER&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&lt;CENTER&gt;423,055&lt;/CENTER&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Total Posts&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&lt;CENTER&gt;1,092,340&lt;/CENTER&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&lt;CENTER&gt;3,476,529&lt;/CENTER&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Conclusion: there's nothing wrong with the forum software, it will scale it way, way beyond the size of the Plusnet Community forums. The problem is Plusnet's inability to identify and fix the problems with the way they have implemented it and/or the hardware platform it is running on.&lt;BR /&gt;If they switched to different software, no doubt they'd make a mess of that too!</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2014 15:11:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Community-Site-Feedback/Should-PN-upgrade-to-a-new-forum/m-p/1088819#M6259</guid>
      <dc:creator>jelv</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-04-19T15:11:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Should PN upgrade to a new forum ??</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Community-Site-Feedback/Should-PN-upgrade-to-a-new-forum/m-p/1088820#M6260</link>
      <description>If there is nothing wrong with the clearly outdated forum software&lt;BR /&gt;Why is there so many complaint(s) referring to the various different problems / issue(s) ?? ?? ?&lt;img class="lia-deferred-image lia-image-emoji" src="https://community.plus.net/html/@3681646702FDFD32BCA97E2E5F1BDDD5/images/emoticons/huh.gif" alt="Huh" title="Huh" /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;To which the some problems are clearly getting worse ?? ?? ?&lt;img class="lia-deferred-image lia-image-emoji" src="https://community.plus.net/html/@3681646702FDFD32BCA97E2E5F1BDDD5/images/emoticons/huh.gif" alt="Huh" title="Huh" /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Since they have undated their Call Centre, bringing it into the 21&lt;SUP&gt;st&lt;/SUP&gt; century then surely it makes sense to bring the forum up-to date to cater for future proofing as best as possible</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2014 15:17:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Community-Site-Feedback/Should-PN-upgrade-to-a-new-forum/m-p/1088820#M6260</guid>
      <dc:creator>TORPC</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-04-19T15:17:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Should PN upgrade to a new forum ??</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Community-Site-Feedback/Should-PN-upgrade-to-a-new-forum/m-p/1088821#M6261</link>
      <description>I am sure that you will point out I am wrong but a quick glance the Simple Machines Forum doesn't allow image uploads only links&lt;BR /&gt;If this is the case this could be the problem as is shown by the number of times posts with uploaded images hang&lt;BR /&gt;I have no idea what the total forum server load is with and without the images but I would imagine that the difference is significant</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2014 15:18:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Community-Site-Feedback/Should-PN-upgrade-to-a-new-forum/m-p/1088821#M6261</guid>
      <dc:creator>Oldjim</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-04-19T15:18:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Should PN upgrade to a new forum ??</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Community-Site-Feedback/Should-PN-upgrade-to-a-new-forum/m-p/1088822#M6262</link>
      <description>They have a mod for that &lt;A href="http://custom.simplemachines.org/mods/index.php?mod=1669" target="_blank"&gt;http://custom.simplemachines.org/mods/index.php?mod=1669&lt;/A&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2014 15:23:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Community-Site-Feedback/Should-PN-upgrade-to-a-new-forum/m-p/1088822#M6262</guid>
      <dc:creator>TORPC</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-04-19T15:23:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Should PN upgrade to a new forum ??</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Community-Site-Feedback/Should-PN-upgrade-to-a-new-forum/m-p/1088823#M6263</link>
      <description>SMF allows posting of attachments (including images) by default. They must have disallowed images in the permissions on some of the boards.&lt;BR /&gt;But look here: &lt;A href="http://www.simplemachines.org/community/index.php?topic=520872.0" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.simplemachines.org/community/index.php?topic=520872.0&lt;/A&gt; - it can't be across the board.&lt;BR /&gt;Were you logged in on their forums when you tried?</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2014 15:57:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Community-Site-Feedback/Should-PN-upgrade-to-a-new-forum/m-p/1088823#M6263</guid>
      <dc:creator>jelv</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-04-19T15:57:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Should PN upgrade to a new forum ??</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Community-Site-Feedback/Should-PN-upgrade-to-a-new-forum/m-p/1088824#M6264</link>
      <description>I am not a member of the forum and that link takes you to a login screen&lt;BR /&gt;Can you post a link to a thread where there are attachments included</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2014 16:04:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Community-Site-Feedback/Should-PN-upgrade-to-a-new-forum/m-p/1088824#M6264</guid>
      <dc:creator>Oldjim</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-04-19T16:04:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Should PN upgrade to a new forum ??</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Community-Site-Feedback/Should-PN-upgrade-to-a-new-forum/m-p/1088825#M6265</link>
      <description>&lt;A href="http://wiki.simplemachines.org/smf/SMF2.0:Attachments_and_Avatars" target="_blank"&gt;http://wiki.simplemachines.org/smf/SMF2.0:Attachments_and_Avatars&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2014 16:08:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Community-Site-Feedback/Should-PN-upgrade-to-a-new-forum/m-p/1088825#M6265</guid>
      <dc:creator>TORPC</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-04-19T16:08:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Should PN upgrade to a new forum ??</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Community-Site-Feedback/Should-PN-upgrade-to-a-new-forum/m-p/1088826#M6266</link>
      <description>The question isn't whether the software permits it &lt;BR /&gt;It is whether the Community Forum there allows them</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2014 16:10:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Community-Site-Feedback/Should-PN-upgrade-to-a-new-forum/m-p/1088826#M6266</guid>
      <dc:creator>Oldjim</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-04-19T16:10:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Should PN upgrade to a new forum ??</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Community-Site-Feedback/Should-PN-upgrade-to-a-new-forum/m-p/1088827#M6267</link>
      <description>That was a link to a post with an attachment!</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2014 16:11:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Community-Site-Feedback/Should-PN-upgrade-to-a-new-forum/m-p/1088827#M6267</guid>
      <dc:creator>jelv</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-04-19T16:11:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

