topic Re: ‘3 weeks’ is a long time in Community Site Feedback

‘3 weeks’ is a long time

Be3G — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:04:10 GMT

See screenshot - only started happening yesterday as far as I'm aware.

Re: ‘3 weeks’ is a long time

James — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:05:10 GMT

Looks like a daylight savings issue. We're looking into it though!

Re: ‘3 weeks’ is a long time

pierre_pierre — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 13:57:13 GMT

yup we are now on GMT but as usual, PN hasnt changed the forum clock

Re: ‘3 weeks’ is a long time

pierre_pierre — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 13:57:44 GMT

whoops, they have

Re: ‘3 weeks’ is a long time

amateur1 — Sun, 15 Nov 2009 00:23:05 GMT

Is this being looked into, as it is now for 3 weeks that the new posts have all said '3 weeks'..??!!

Re: ‘3 weeks’ is a long time

VileReynard — Sun, 15 Nov 2009 00:32:23 GMT

It will be fixed in 3 weeks time.

Re: ‘3 weeks’ is a long time

amateur1 — Sun, 15 Nov 2009 00:47:13 GMT

Re:‘3 weeks’ is a long time

Mand — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 10:30:07 GMT

Hi guys,
We've got a problem raised on this, I'll have a word and see if I can get it moving.

Re: ‘3 weeks’ is a long time

MauriceC — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 14:33:08 GMT

But will the solution become another component stuck in the great code freeze of 2009
Maurice

Re:‘3 weeks’ is a long time

Mand — Tue, 17 Nov 2009 10:52:26 GMT

There is no 'great code freeze of 2009', we're just keeping a particularly tight rein on things for the moment, and not making changes for changes sake. Problem fixes are still being rolled, but in priority order.

Re: ‘3 weeks’ is a long time

jelv — Tue, 01 Dec 2009 14:00:10 GMT

" ‘3 weeks’ is a long time"
That's true - but it's now 5 weeks since this issue was reported. The front page of Community is not a great advert for Plusnet!

Re: ‘3 weeks’ is a long time

VileReynard — Tue, 01 Dec 2009 14:17:03 GMT

3 weeks is 110111010111110000000 seconds.

Re: ‘3 weeks’ is a long time

dvorak — Tue, 01 Dec 2009 14:19:11 GMT

I suspect it might also be the least of some posters problems...

Re: ‘3 weeks’ is a long time

mal0z — Tue, 01 Dec 2009 14:28:01 GMT

1BAF80

Re: ‘3 weeks’ is a long time

shutter — Tue, 01 Dec 2009 16:25:25 GMT

Hmm... last time I had a response from Plusnet staff on "Employ more staff....... " thread.... was 3 weeks..... then I put a note in Rants, and two of them turned up within 10 minutes !...
My latest offering has only been up there for 2 days, so far, so another 2 weeks and 5 days to wait, ... ?

Re: ‘3 weeks’ is a long time

Be3G — Mon, 07 Dec 2009 15:08:26 GMT

Yes, it would be rather nice if PN could think about fixing it some time before, say, we revert to BST again!

Re: ‘3 weeks’ is a long time

csogilvie — Tue, 08 Dec 2009 10:01:54 GMT

I'm more baffled as to why it's broken, as I thought I'd managed to get it fixed permanently last time round
It's also more annoying when I know exactly what is broken

Re: ‘3 weeks’ is a long time

VileReynard — Tue, 08 Dec 2009 14:35:16 GMT

Quote from: cso
It's also more annoying when I know exactly what is broken

What exactly is broken?

Re: ‘3 weeks’ is a long time

csogilvie — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 12:20:39 GMT

I'm not going to go in to details.
Hopefully this'll be fixed next week sometime otherwise I suspect we'll be stuck with it until the New Year

Re: ‘3 weeks’ is a long time

Be3G — Tue, 19 Jan 2010 17:30:34 GMT

Quote from: Be3G
Yes, it would be rather nice if PN could think about fixing it some time before, say, we revert to BST again!

We're now over halfway through the period of GMT and still no sign of a fix…