<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Improving communication in Community Site Feedback</title>
    <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Community-Site-Feedback/Improving-communication/m-p/1369254#M11578</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;This is a proposal that was first floated on the PlusNet Feedback board; the merits may be better debated here.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Readers will be aware of the thread on the fibre board about DNS and packet-loss. The thread on packet-loss is (as I write) up to 62 pages. There are contributions in there from &lt;A href="https://community.plus.net/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/14" target="_blank"&gt;@bobpullen&lt;/A&gt; and &lt;A href="https://community.plus.net/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/21" target="_blank"&gt;@dave&lt;/A&gt; but they are hard to find. I certainly missed some of Bob's most recent posts. The absence of any summary of PlusNet statements makes it difficult for users to see what is happening.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;PlusNet haven't been willing to put such posts into a separate status thread. I wondered whether Lithium provided a simple, automated way in which posts from nominated individuals on a particular thread could be copied into a separate thread - in this case something like "PlusNet on packet-loss".&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;And, if it were possible, whether there would be support for doing so? The underlying issue addressed is, apparently, going to go on for another couple of weeks.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2016 07:33:58 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>BrightonRock</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-09-19T07:33:58Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Improving communication</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Community-Site-Feedback/Improving-communication/m-p/1369254#M11578</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This is a proposal that was first floated on the PlusNet Feedback board; the merits may be better debated here.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Readers will be aware of the thread on the fibre board about DNS and packet-loss. The thread on packet-loss is (as I write) up to 62 pages. There are contributions in there from &lt;A href="https://community.plus.net/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/14" target="_blank"&gt;@bobpullen&lt;/A&gt; and &lt;A href="https://community.plus.net/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/21" target="_blank"&gt;@dave&lt;/A&gt; but they are hard to find. I certainly missed some of Bob's most recent posts. The absence of any summary of PlusNet statements makes it difficult for users to see what is happening.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;PlusNet haven't been willing to put such posts into a separate status thread. I wondered whether Lithium provided a simple, automated way in which posts from nominated individuals on a particular thread could be copied into a separate thread - in this case something like "PlusNet on packet-loss".&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;And, if it were possible, whether there would be support for doing so? The underlying issue addressed is, apparently, going to go on for another couple of weeks.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2016 07:33:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Community-Site-Feedback/Improving-communication/m-p/1369254#M11578</guid>
      <dc:creator>BrightonRock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-09-19T07:33:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Improving communication</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Community-Site-Feedback/Improving-communication/m-p/1369262#M11579</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="lia-message-author-username lia-component-simple-username"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="UserName lia-user-name lia-user-rank-Rising-Star"&gt; &lt;A id="link_21" class="lia-link-navigation lia-page-link lia-user-name-link" href="https://community.plus.net/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/37079" target="_self"&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;BrightonRock&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt; Exactly what a few have been saying for at least 2 weeks,,&lt;A href="https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/The-communications-company-that-doesn-t-communicate/td-p/1364847" target="_blank"&gt;https://community.plus.net/t5/Plusnet-Feedback/The-communications-company-that-doesn-t-communicate/td-p/1364847&lt;/A&gt;
&lt;DIV class="lia-message-author-username lia-component-simple-username"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="UserName lia-user-name lia-user-rank-Rising-Star"&gt; &lt;A id="link_21" class="lia-link-navigation lia-page-link lia-user-name-link" href="https://community.plus.net/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/37079" target="_self"&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV class="lia-message-author-username lia-component-simple-username"&gt;I dont think that Lithium would be able to do anything , its all down to the PN staff here to&amp;nbsp;communicate to its customers&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV class="lia-message-author-username lia-component-simple-username"&gt;if they have a MAJOR problem as in the packet loss thread , BUT for some reason it has been decided not to highlight this , maybe its because its a open forum and they dont want to admit they are having major problems , On ISP preview they&amp;nbsp;admitted a Small number had problems , but this SMALL &lt;img class="lia-deferred-image lia-image-emoji" src="https://community.plus.net/html/@D10385D46FF09B2E8FF20B0746B65E6F/images/emoticons/shocked.gif" alt="Shocked" title="Shocked" /&gt;&amp;nbsp; number is increasing &lt;img class="lia-deferred-image lia-image-emoji" src="https://community.plus.net/html/@39CAA4D3C5337609D22BCCF670FC8D42/images/emoticons/embarrassed.gif" alt="Embarrassed" title="Embarrassed" /&gt;.&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV class="lia-message-author-username lia-component-simple-username"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV class="lia-message-author-username lia-component-simple-username"&gt;Would love to see the PN top escalators grow a pair and admit something is wrong which is taking too long to fix , 5 weeks now with a possible 2 more weeks , or even longer .&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV class="lia-message-author-username lia-component-simple-username"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV class="lia-message-author-username lia-component-simple-username"&gt;Or do the upper staff live in denial !!&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV class="lia-message-author-username lia-component-simple-username"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV class="lia-message-author-username lia-component-simple-username"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2016 08:05:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Community-Site-Feedback/Improving-communication/m-p/1369262#M11579</guid>
      <dc:creator>rongtw</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-09-19T08:05:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

