<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Slight FTTC speed drop in Broadband</title>
    <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Broadband/Slight-FTTC-speed-drop/m-p/2015949#M372624</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.plus.net/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/24565"&gt;@pvmb&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Small differences like that could be explained by the fact that many speed testers will dynamically choose what they think is your nearest and least loaded speed test server, before performing the test.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Therefore from test to test, you might be comparing different servers, that will be different distances from you, or be under different loading at different times of day, etc.&amp;nbsp; So not surprising to see a 2Mbps variation without knowing more information.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I rarely use speed testers, but instead check my modem's line stats, to see how it's performing.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Not having used the "&lt;A href="https://fast.com/en/gb/#" target="_self"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Fast&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/A&gt;" speed test before, I just ran it to see if it showed which server it used, here it shows "&lt;STRONG&gt;Slough&lt;/STRONG&gt;" -&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Screenshot 2025-08-04 at 18-59-53 FAST Internet Speed Test.jpg" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.plus.net/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/61159i16F46714D2350DDA/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="Screenshot 2025-08-04 at 18-59-53 FAST Internet Speed Test.jpg" alt="Screenshot 2025-08-04 at 18-59-53 FAST Internet Speed Test.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2025 18:17:27 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>outcast</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-08-04T18:17:27Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Slight FTTC speed drop</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Broadband/Slight-FTTC-speed-drop/m-p/2015944#M372622</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;My VDSL speed has dropped a bit from a measured 37Mbps to 35Mbps&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;FAST&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Yout Internet speed is&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;35 Mbps&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I recently decided to retest the link from my PC to Hub 2 router using my little TP-Link USB WiFi device instead of Ethernet connection, with the router placed near where it might be if ever I went the FTTP route. I moved the router from its normal LJ style extension socket (also a master socket!) to the 'proper' Openreach NTE5C master socket (Oh dear! - shouldn't have done that?).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Since then, I've had a few disconnections and now I find the measured download speed has dropped to 35Mbps from the normal, long term measured 37Mbps (I am on a 40/10 Mbps service).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I knew I shouldn't have touched that NTE5C, normally I leave it strictly alone. Best to not even look at it, in case it takes offence...&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Could this 35Mbps speed correspond to any banding of the line? To date I have been impressed with FTTC's long term reliability and stability and I don't want things to go the same way as ADSL 2+.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2025 17:35:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Broadband/Slight-FTTC-speed-drop/m-p/2015944#M372622</guid>
      <dc:creator>pvmb</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-08-04T17:35:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Slight FTTC speed drop</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Broadband/Slight-FTTC-speed-drop/m-p/2015945#M372623</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.plus.net/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/24565"&gt;@pvmb&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;A drop from 37 to 35 has nothing to do with 'banding' - if you were subject to that the speed reduction would be much more severe.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Have the disconnections involved a loss&amp;nbsp; of DSL? Has your SNR&amp;nbsp; changed?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Is the TP-link device still in play?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2025 17:54:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Broadband/Slight-FTTC-speed-drop/m-p/2015945#M372623</guid>
      <dc:creator>jab1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-08-04T17:54:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Slight FTTC speed drop</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Broadband/Slight-FTTC-speed-drop/m-p/2015949#M372624</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.plus.net/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/24565"&gt;@pvmb&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Small differences like that could be explained by the fact that many speed testers will dynamically choose what they think is your nearest and least loaded speed test server, before performing the test.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Therefore from test to test, you might be comparing different servers, that will be different distances from you, or be under different loading at different times of day, etc.&amp;nbsp; So not surprising to see a 2Mbps variation without knowing more information.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I rarely use speed testers, but instead check my modem's line stats, to see how it's performing.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Not having used the "&lt;A href="https://fast.com/en/gb/#" target="_self"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Fast&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/A&gt;" speed test before, I just ran it to see if it showed which server it used, here it shows "&lt;STRONG&gt;Slough&lt;/STRONG&gt;" -&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Screenshot 2025-08-04 at 18-59-53 FAST Internet Speed Test.jpg" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.plus.net/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/61159i16F46714D2350DDA/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="Screenshot 2025-08-04 at 18-59-53 FAST Internet Speed Test.jpg" alt="Screenshot 2025-08-04 at 18-59-53 FAST Internet Speed Test.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2025 18:17:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Broadband/Slight-FTTC-speed-drop/m-p/2015949#M372624</guid>
      <dc:creator>outcast</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-08-04T18:17:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Slight FTTC speed drop</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Broadband/Slight-FTTC-speed-drop/m-p/2015951#M372625</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.plus.net/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/24565"&gt;@pvmb&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Hmmm,&amp;nbsp; I'm not impressed with that &lt;A href="https://fast.com/en/gb/#" target="_self"&gt;Fast&lt;/A&gt; speed tester.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I just logged in to my router so that I could monitor my WAN and LAN speeds, and ensure I had no other network traffic running&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I then ran that &lt;A href="https://fast.com/en/gb/#" target="_self"&gt;Fast&lt;/A&gt; tester, TEN times in succession, and got varying results from 63Mbps to 69Mbps.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I know from years of tuning my setup, that variation IS NOT my line or equipment.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Running the &lt;A href="https://embeddable-speedtest.samknows.com/" target="_self"&gt;SamKnows&lt;/A&gt; tester TEN times in succession, gave me consistent results every time within 0.1Mbps.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2025 18:30:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Broadband/Slight-FTTC-speed-drop/m-p/2015951#M372625</guid>
      <dc:creator>outcast</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-08-04T18:30:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Slight FTTC speed drop</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Broadband/Slight-FTTC-speed-drop/m-p/2015952#M372626</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You tracking me,&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.plus.net/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/144284"&gt;@outcast&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;? Every time I answer a post, you pop up within seconds.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2025 18:34:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Broadband/Slight-FTTC-speed-drop/m-p/2015952#M372626</guid>
      <dc:creator>jab1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-08-04T18:34:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Slight FTTC speed drop</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Broadband/Slight-FTTC-speed-drop/m-p/2015955#M372628</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If you use the FAST test, using non-default settings (which can be set to operate over minutes, rather than seconds and a bit more).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;As far as I can see, SAMknows doesn't have those types of settings.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Using the FAST tester with parameters set at their maximum might indicate that even FTTP connections are not as such. I've a couple of 5 minute tests that fall outside the MGL.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2025 20:23:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Broadband/Slight-FTTC-speed-drop/m-p/2015955#M372628</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-08-04T20:23:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Slight FTTC speed drop</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Broadband/Slight-FTTC-speed-drop/m-p/2015956#M372629</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have used the TBB speed test facility ever since I moved to Zen (and a static IP) on both FTTC and FTTP and found it consistent.&amp;nbsp; I also use speedtest.net&amp;nbsp; (Ookla), which also gives consistent, and comparable, results.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2025 20:30:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Broadband/Slight-FTTC-speed-drop/m-p/2015956#M372629</guid>
      <dc:creator>jab1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-08-04T20:30:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Slight FTTC speed drop</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Broadband/Slight-FTTC-speed-drop/m-p/2015958#M372630</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;@Anonymous&amp;nbsp;wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If you use the FAST test, using non-default settings (which can be set to operate over minutes, rather than seconds and a bit more).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Initially I thought that was interesting, and something new I've learned today which might be useful.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;So I went in to my router and setup rate limiters on my WAN up and down traffic, so a restricted bandwidth less than the VDSL IP profile, would give consistent throughput during tests.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;As advised, I changed the FAST settings to run for 300 seconds,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Then ran multiple extended duration FAST tests, with results varying from the limiter rate -3Mbps to limiter rate +4Mbps.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Conclusion : &lt;STRONG&gt;USELESS&lt;/STRONG&gt; !&amp;nbsp; &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":face_with_rolling_eyes:"&gt;🙄&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I'll stick with my favourite &lt;A href="https://www.waveform.com/tools/bufferbloat" target="_self"&gt;Waveform&lt;/A&gt; test. &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":smiling_face_with_sunglasses:"&gt;😎&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2025 21:00:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Broadband/Slight-FTTC-speed-drop/m-p/2015958#M372630</guid>
      <dc:creator>outcast</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-08-04T21:00:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Slight FTTC speed drop</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Broadband/Slight-FTTC-speed-drop/m-p/2015971#M372631</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.plus.net/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/18089"&gt;@jab1&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.plus.net/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/24565"&gt;@pvmb&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;A drop from 37 to 35 has nothing to do with 'banding' - if you were subject to that the speed reduction would be much more severe.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Have the disconnections involved a loss&amp;nbsp; of DSL? Has your SNR&amp;nbsp; changed?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Is the TP-link device still in play?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Yes, the DSL has subsequently dropped a few times (n&lt;SPAN&gt;o drop in the last 5 hours&lt;/SPAN&gt;) - I blame me going anywhere near the NTE5C. I am still using the TP-Link, until I finish testing. But, when originally set up, I immediately tested the speed and at that time it was the usual 37Mbps. I don't know about any change in the SNR. Currently&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;18.8 / 16.1 dB which seems about normal from memory.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Interesting! The Think Broadband Test gives 35 Mbps (or slightly over) while reporting "&lt;EM&gt;Postcode average for last three months&lt;/EM&gt;" as 37.3 Mbps/8.8 Mbps.&amp;nbsp;&lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":thinking_face:"&gt;🤔&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2025 22:30:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Broadband/Slight-FTTC-speed-drop/m-p/2015971#M372631</guid>
      <dc:creator>pvmb</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-08-04T22:30:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Slight FTTC speed drop</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Broadband/Slight-FTTC-speed-drop/m-p/2015979#M372632</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I doubt the error log will tell us much, but if you could export it and attach the resulting .csv file to a post along with your Technical Log, we might spot something.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2025 06:28:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Broadband/Slight-FTTC-speed-drop/m-p/2015979#M372632</guid>
      <dc:creator>jab1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-08-05T06:28:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Slight FTTC speed drop</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Broadband/Slight-FTTC-speed-drop/m-p/2015990#M372633</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Strange those quoted TBB speed figures of "&lt;EM&gt;average for last&amp;nbsp;three months&lt;/EM&gt;" correspond pretty well exactly to my usually expected measurements from FAST even though I don't usually use the TBB speed test. Do they have something in common, or do speed testers share figures?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Still showing a FAST measured speed of ~35 Mbps after 15 hours with no drop. One other quirk I have noticed, which may be completely irrelevant, is the sync speeds shown on the Hub 2 home page:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Downstream sync speed&lt;/STRONG&gt;: 39.999 Mbps&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Upstream sync speed&lt;/STRONG&gt;: 10 Mbps&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Whereas, normally these would be:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Downstream sync speed&lt;/STRONG&gt;: 40 Mbps&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Upstream sync speed&lt;/STRONG&gt;: 9.999 Mbps&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Here are a couple of examples of DSL failure - I have little doubt they were due to the main NTE5C socket:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;17:37:58 04/08/25 WAN connection WAN2_INTERNET_PTM connected &lt;BR /&gt;17:37:39 04/08/25 DSL Link Up: Down Rate=14361kbps Up Rate=9999kbps; SNR Margin Down=5.9dB Up=5.8dB&lt;BR /&gt;17:37:31 04/08/25 WAN Auto-sensing detected port DSL WAN &lt;BR /&gt;17:36:46 04/08/25 WAN Sensing Auto sensing Complete interface selected &lt;BR /&gt;17:36:46 04/08/25 WAN Sensing Auto sensing Running &lt;BR /&gt;17:36:46 04/08/25 WAN connection WAN2_INTERNET_PTM disconnected [ERROR_NO_CARRIER] &lt;BR /&gt;17:36:45 04/08/25 DSL Link Down: duration was 67 seconds &lt;BR /&gt;17:36:05 04/08/25 WAN Sensing Auto sensing Complete interface selected &lt;BR /&gt;17:36:05 04/08/25 WAN Sensing Auto sensing Running &lt;BR /&gt;17:36:05 04/08/25 Success - secondary DNS servers &lt;BR /&gt;17:36:05 04/08/25 Success - primary DNS servers &lt;BR /&gt;17:36:05 04/08/25 WAN connection WAN2_INTERNET_PTM connected &lt;BR /&gt;17:35:46 04/08/25 DSL Link Up: Down Rate=39999kbps Up Rate=10000kbps; SNR Margin Down=14.3dB Up=17.1dB&lt;BR /&gt;17:35:38 04/08/25 WAN Auto-sensing detected port DSL WAN &lt;BR /&gt;17:35:05 04/08/25 DSL Link Down: duration was 31 seconds &lt;BR /&gt;17:34:42 04/08/25 DSL Link Up: Down Rate=28134kbps Up Rate=10000kbps; SNR Margin Down=5.4dB Up=13.6dB&lt;BR /&gt;17:34:34 04/08/25 WAN Auto-sensing detected port DSL WAN &lt;BR /&gt;17:34:02 04/08/25 WAN Sensing Auto sensing Complete interface selected &lt;BR /&gt;17:34:01 04/08/25 WAN Sensing Auto sensing Running &lt;BR /&gt;17:34:01 04/08/25 WAN connection WAN2_INTERNET_PTM disconnected [ERROR_NO_CARRIER] &lt;BR /&gt;17:34:00 04/08/25 DSL Link Down: duration was 31793 seconds &lt;BR /&gt;08:44:31 04/08/25 WAN Sensing Auto sensing Complete interface selected &lt;BR /&gt;08:44:31 04/08/25 Success - secondary DNS servers &lt;BR /&gt;08:44:31 04/08/25 WAN Sensing Auto sensing Running &lt;BR /&gt;08:44:31 04/08/25 Success - primary DNS servers &lt;BR /&gt;08:44:31 04/08/25 WAN connection WAN2_INTERNET_PTM connected &lt;BR /&gt;08:44:15 04/08/25 DSL Link Up: Down Rate=39999kbps Up Rate=10000kbps; SNR Margin Down=15.4dB Up=16.9dB&lt;BR /&gt;08:44:07 04/08/25 WAN Auto-sensing detected port DSL WAN &lt;BR /&gt;08:43:16 04/08/25 WAN Auto-sensing last connection port: DSL WAN &lt;BR /&gt;10:03:07 03/08/25 WAN Sensing Auto sensing Complete interface selected &lt;BR /&gt;10:03:07 03/08/25 WAN Sensing Auto sensing Running &lt;BR /&gt;10:03:07 03/08/25 Success - secondary DNS servers &lt;BR /&gt;10:03:07 03/08/25 Success - primary DNS servers &lt;BR /&gt;10:03:07 03/08/25 WAN connection WAN2_INTERNET_PTM connected &lt;BR /&gt;10:02:49 03/08/25 DSL Link Up: Down Rate=39999kbps Up Rate=10000kbps; SNR Margin Down=15.4dB Up=16.9dB&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Here is a typical past DSL link statistic&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;22:39:29 31/07/25 DSL Link Up: Down Rate=40000kbps Up Rate=9999kbps; SNR Margin Down=16.5dB Up=14.3dB&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I will be ending my test of the remote router positioning soon and see what the results are after I return it to its normal LJ extension phone socket and linked to the PC by Ethernet cable.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I know the drop in speed is quite small, but I remember ADSL 2+ ratcheting down in speed over the years whenever 'something' happened - and never successfully recovering long term.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2025 08:34:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Broadband/Slight-FTTC-speed-drop/m-p/2015990#M372633</guid>
      <dc:creator>pvmb</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-08-05T08:34:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Slight FTTC speed drop</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Broadband/Slight-FTTC-speed-drop/m-p/2015994#M372634</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.plus.net/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/24565"&gt;@pvmb&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;wrote:
&lt;P&gt;I recently decided to retest the link from my PC to Hub 2 router using my little TP-Link USB WiFi device instead of Ethernet connection,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;So instead of testing over Ethernet you are using wireless? This makes any comparisons totally irrelevant. Both tests should be using the same Ethernet cable.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.plus.net/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/24565"&gt;@pvmb&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;. I moved the router from its normal LJ style extension socket (also a master socket!) to the 'proper' Openreach NTE5C master socket&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You can’t have two Master sockets, you are normally using an extension. If you want the best possible speed you should locate the hub at the real master socket location, fit a filtered faceplate and move all the extensions to the faceplate filtered output. If necessary run Ethernet cable to your computer location.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;When you move to Full Fibre you can have the ONT installed by the master socket then use the Ethernet cable to connect the ONT WAN &amp;nbsp;to your router, which you can put back in your preferred location.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2025 09:08:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Broadband/Slight-FTTC-speed-drop/m-p/2015994#M372634</guid>
      <dc:creator>Baldrick1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-08-05T09:08:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Slight FTTC speed drop</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Broadband/Slight-FTTC-speed-drop/m-p/2016015#M372635</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Couple of points.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I do have two master sockets!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The LJ extension socket I normally use is also a master socket - i.e. it has all the componets of a standard master socket. Including ring capacitor and the old surge arrester.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The router is currently plugged in to the NTE5C 'Test' socket - in order to minimise NTE5C issues. The WiFi adaptor is using 5G, it is rated as "&lt;EM&gt;867 Mbps on 5 GHz&lt;/EM&gt;". Unless I am mistaken - which is possible - originally the link tested at 37Mbps before the subsequent DSL drops, which I have no doubt were due to the NTE5C master socket.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;But, as I said, I will be moving the router back to the extension socket in a day or so and will see then what happens when it is reconnected via Ethernet. I will report if it reverts to 'normal' 37 Mbps. I hope it does!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2025 10:24:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Broadband/Slight-FTTC-speed-drop/m-p/2016015#M372635</guid>
      <dc:creator>pvmb</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-08-05T10:24:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Slight FTTC speed drop</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Broadband/Slight-FTTC-speed-drop/m-p/2016016#M372636</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.plus.net/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/24565"&gt;@pvmb&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;31/07/25 DSL Link Up: Down Rate=40000kbps Up Rate=9999kbps; SNR Margin Down=16.5dB Up=14.3dB&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.plus.net/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/24565"&gt;@pvmb&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;With line stats like that, plugging your router in to the master socket (where the external landline comes in) using a short DSL cable, and removing the extension phone wiring (which you won't be needing after the imminent PSTN phone switch-off), if you then upgraded from FTTC to SoGEA, I estimate that when your SNR margin drops to 6.0dB, that your 40/10Mbps line speeds would increase to a minimum of 60/15Mbps, and could reach 70/18Mbps.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Worrying about whether your speed test shows 37Mb or 35Mb would be irrelevant, as your speeds might double !.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;As you've previously mentioned that FTTP is available to you, obviously that is the much better choice, with better reliability, better speeds, and at the cost shown below is probably cheaper than what you're paying for you 40/10 FTTC. -&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Plusnet Full Fibre 74 - Aug 2025.png" style="width: 368px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.plus.net/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/61162i469F2714CE6B293E/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="Plusnet Full Fibre 74 - Aug 2025.png" alt="Plusnet Full Fibre 74 - Aug 2025.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2025 10:30:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Broadband/Slight-FTTC-speed-drop/m-p/2016016#M372636</guid>
      <dc:creator>outcast</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-08-05T10:30:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Slight FTTC speed drop</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Broadband/Slight-FTTC-speed-drop/m-p/2016347#M372736</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Testing completed:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Router with 5GHz WiFi moved from master socket test socket back to location by extension socket and plugged in. Still testing at 35 Mbps download on 5GHz WiFi..&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Router WiFi turned off and plugged into PC via Ethernet cable. Still testing at 35 Mbps download (rather than previous, stable 37Mbps). Will we ever really know?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Ah! The vagaries of Broadband...&amp;nbsp;&lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":thinking_face:"&gt;🤔&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2025 14:31:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Broadband/Slight-FTTC-speed-drop/m-p/2016347#M372736</guid>
      <dc:creator>pvmb</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-08-07T14:31:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Slight FTTC speed drop</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Broadband/Slight-FTTC-speed-drop/m-p/2016348#M372737</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;And you really notice that missing 2Mb/s, right?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2025 14:34:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Broadband/Slight-FTTC-speed-drop/m-p/2016348#M372737</guid>
      <dc:creator>jab1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-08-07T14:34:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Slight FTTC speed drop</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Broadband/Slight-FTTC-speed-drop/m-p/2017538#M372899</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;So the latest is...&amp;nbsp;Following a recent break in connection, likely when I was out during the day, what do I find?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I now get speeds testing up to 37/38 Mbps again. (Though very variable, for some reason)&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2025 22:35:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Broadband/Slight-FTTC-speed-drop/m-p/2017538#M372899</guid>
      <dc:creator>pvmb</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-08-18T22:35:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Slight FTTC speed drop</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Broadband/Slight-FTTC-speed-drop/m-p/2017539#M372900</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;...But not today! 17 August:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;02:17:02, 17 Aug. DSL Link Down: duration was 817320 seconds&lt;BR /&gt;02:17:03, 17 Aug. WAN connection WAN2_INTERNET_PTM disconnected.[ERROR_NO_CARRIER]&lt;BR /&gt;02:17:03, 17 Aug. WAN Sensing Auto sensing Running&lt;BR /&gt;02:17:03, 17 Aug. WAN Sensing Auto sensing Complete, interface selected&lt;BR /&gt;02:17:32, 17 Aug. WAN Auto-sensing detected port DSL WAN&lt;BR /&gt;02:17:40, 17 Aug. DSL Link Up: Down Rate=40000kbps, Up Rate=9999kbps; SNR Margin Down=17.0dB, Up=22.1dB&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Yeah, that's definitely a higher SNR margin than previously reported, after a half hour break overnight. &lt;EM&gt;Something&lt;/EM&gt; must have happened, somewhere.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Nobody knows!&amp;nbsp;&lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":grinning_face:"&gt;😀&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Another curiosity, as before slight speed reduction, Hub 2 now showing;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;DIV id="upspeed" class="thebox"&gt;
&lt;DIV id="upspeed" class="thebox"&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Downstream sync speed&lt;/STRONG&gt;: 40 Mbps&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Upstream sync speed&lt;/STRONG&gt;: 9.999 Mbps&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Instead of what was showing after slight drop in speed:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Downstream sync speed&lt;/STRONG&gt;: 39.999 Mbps&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Upstream sync speed&lt;/STRONG&gt;: 10 Mbps&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2025 23:26:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Broadband/Slight-FTTC-speed-drop/m-p/2017539#M372900</guid>
      <dc:creator>pvmb</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-08-18T23:26:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Slight FTTC speed drop</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Broadband/Slight-FTTC-speed-drop/m-p/2018419#M372944</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The only thing which is going to explain your experience here is massive electrical interference giving rise to a high data retransmission rate.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This line is capable of far more than the provisioned 40/10 line rate, which is what is it synching at.&amp;nbsp; If the DATA speed test is not consistently close to that, then you need to look at the possible causes of slow data transfer OTHER THAN the line sync rate.&amp;nbsp; This considerations include...&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Local Area Network connection
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;WiFi&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Ethernet over Power adapters&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Host PC NIC configuration&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Concurrency of use (other devices uploading / streaming)&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Device
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Processor performance&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Disk read / write performance&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;WAN - data retransmission over heads due to (transient) line noise (is the phone line&amp;nbsp;&lt;EM&gt;always&amp;nbsp;&lt;/EM&gt;quiet?)&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Exchange back haul (VLAN capacity)&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Remote data speed test service performance&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2025 14:29:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Broadband/Slight-FTTC-speed-drop/m-p/2018419#M372944</guid>
      <dc:creator>Townman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-08-27T14:29:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Slight FTTC speed drop</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Broadband/Slight-FTTC-speed-drop/m-p/2019596#M373129</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;There was never any doubt in my mind about the cause of the initial disconnection issue. It was due to the inevitable crackles when I moved the router from the normal extension socket to using it on the master socket - due to my testing a Wi-Fi 5Ghz link from the router at the master socket to the PC. Instead of the usual, router on extension socket connected to PC via Ethernet cable.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;What then surprised me was, when everything settled back down to normal, the link was stuck at a slightly lower speed than the usual 37 Mbps. This persisted for several days until, following a disconnection overnight (I think), it reconnected at the usual 37 Mbps. Which it has stayed at ever since. Probably should have tried rebooting the router myself at the time (I though I had).&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2025 10:46:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Broadband/Slight-FTTC-speed-drop/m-p/2019596#M373129</guid>
      <dc:creator>pvmb</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-09-07T10:46:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

