<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Systemic rudeness through systemic stupidity in Broadband</title>
    <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Broadband/Systemic-rudeness-through-systemic-stupidity/m-p/1983634#M367903</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I am having many problems with Plusnet. Each strikes me as a symptom that the company is in a very poor way. But in this post at least I will confine myself to a single point. Here it is.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It seems that sometimes after a conversation with a customer an engineer will create a closed 'ticket' - one to which one cannot add - merely as an act of logging. However, the email advertising the creation of the ticket gives one to believe that one &lt;EM&gt;can&lt;/EM&gt; add to it. Thus one can end up trying and failing to add to the ticket. This creates bogglement. Moreover, if one's problem is unsolved - as in fact mine is - then the situation becomes positively infuriating, especially when one realises the following. &lt;EM&gt;Many&lt;/EM&gt; people will have the same experience. It is a &lt;EM&gt;systemic&lt;/EM&gt; problem; and, as with most systemic problems with large organisations (or at least those of them that are badly run), &lt;EM&gt;it is never going to get fixed - is it&lt;/EM&gt;?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2024 00:57:19 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>JustSomeAnodyne</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-08-28T00:57:19Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Systemic rudeness through systemic stupidity</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Broadband/Systemic-rudeness-through-systemic-stupidity/m-p/1983634#M367903</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am having many problems with Plusnet. Each strikes me as a symptom that the company is in a very poor way. But in this post at least I will confine myself to a single point. Here it is.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It seems that sometimes after a conversation with a customer an engineer will create a closed 'ticket' - one to which one cannot add - merely as an act of logging. However, the email advertising the creation of the ticket gives one to believe that one &lt;EM&gt;can&lt;/EM&gt; add to it. Thus one can end up trying and failing to add to the ticket. This creates bogglement. Moreover, if one's problem is unsolved - as in fact mine is - then the situation becomes positively infuriating, especially when one realises the following. &lt;EM&gt;Many&lt;/EM&gt; people will have the same experience. It is a &lt;EM&gt;systemic&lt;/EM&gt; problem; and, as with most systemic problems with large organisations (or at least those of them that are badly run), &lt;EM&gt;it is never going to get fixed - is it&lt;/EM&gt;?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2024 00:57:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Broadband/Systemic-rudeness-through-systemic-stupidity/m-p/1983634#M367903</guid>
      <dc:creator>JustSomeAnodyne</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-08-28T00:57:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Systemic rudeness through systemic stupidity</title>
      <link>https://community.plus.net/t5/Broadband/Systemic-rudeness-through-systemic-stupidity/m-p/1983656#M367909</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;So what is the issue you are having here. Maybe if you explain the issues it can be sorted here.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2024 09:57:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.plus.net/t5/Broadband/Systemic-rudeness-through-systemic-stupidity/m-p/1983656#M367909</guid>
      <dc:creator>krusty</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-08-28T09:57:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

