What I can be certain of is that our faults processes now are no different to those prior to the purchase of PlusNet by BT
I hoped they would have improved!
Now that's just looking at things the wrong way, though I do suspect I may have been able to explain this more.
There are many ways to skin a cat, the end result is always the same, a skinned cat (eww).
Prior to the BT takeover, we took an approach to faults which we have carried on since.
We have removed redundant processes and we have added others, were the product and features dictate, systems change or we identify improvements.
Were you already utilise all systems at your disposal, the only way to improve is to identify were we fail, which we already do and I already have some items from this posting to feed back.
lots of PN stuff
If I've understood this correctly then, despite the fact that my speed has dropped from a constant 4.5, to 1.9 at times now, there is actually no fault in BT/PN eyes. The fault is in my imagination, and I only "perceive" that there is a fault, which in reality is a "red-herring" Consequently, I need to be "re-educated".
That's all right then.
Nope, that's just twisting matters.
Lets look at the facts.
Public data is available for your line along with line statistics, historical information and all other data that we have access to, without asking yourself as the customer for information such as your cabling setup to verify this is ADSL compatible.
This information shows your line capable of supporting speeds of upto 2.5mbps.
As many people see this as a figure from the wild, we take all other data available to us and determine how accurate it is and ensure that there is nothing to suggest that it is incorrect.
There is nothing within that data to suggest it is inaccurate.
So, we look at your line historically to see how it has performed in the past. This data agrees with your to show that your line operated at 4.5mbps for some time.
However there is nothing to agree that your line was designed for this speed. This does not override all other data and we have to make our decisions and recommendations based on this.
The product is only designed to provide so much. In some rare instances such as your own, the line can and will operate at faster speeds than is recommended.
Customer need to recognise that these speeds can and in some cases, will reduce.
We will in every case look at the facts of each case. In this case they just do not add up to anything that is a problem with the service.
I fixed my problem by calling 150 and their had been a fault on the line dating back 4 months they fixed it in 30 seconds I now get the full 8mg at times
As the account holder, this would be upto the customer to perform. If we provide the WLR (Home Phone) service, we will perform a line test.
Often this is not required though.
Broadband Diagnostics provides a Copper Line test (it is this test which will cause a customer to disconnect each time we test a line).
This is a miniature version of a voice line test. It is not the most extensive one, as for legal reasons it cannot done some of the more intrusive tests.
As noted, I have already performed all the testing that we have access too. This has included the copper line check and none of them have shown a problem.
We will in some rare instances, call 150 for the customer and raise a fault. This is however only were we know a voice fault exists and they are declining to assist.
We only do this as we know they have effectively lied to a customer. We won't do this in all other cases because of a little something called TRC (Time Related Charges). These are the Voice line equivalent of the £144+vat engineer charges, but can be a lot more.
As we cannot agree to these on the customer behalf, we wont do this.
In regards to this whole issue, I'm going to do what you want. I am going to change how I look at this. Instead of provide our recommendations which is that there is no fault and this is simply the design of the product, I am going to let 430 dictate what we should do.
Please know this before you take me up on this:
1: Your line stats show your line is operating at normal levels.
2: Public data shows it is also working at normal levels
3: Your previous speeds of 4.5mbps were above what was found to be "normal levels" for your service and whilst they may be a "nice to have", are not guaranteed.
From our recommendations know this:
1: We have performed line tests that have shown no faults on either the copper line or the exchange equipment (the two elements that dictate speed, other than your own equipment or cabling).
2: Our recommendations are made with the best intentions of the customer possible. Charges can result were we proceed beyond this point.
That said, if you want us to raise this fault to BT, I will do so. I can guarantee that the process will go something like this.
1: We raise a fault to BT
2: BT perform line diagnostics and confirm the findings already presented to you in public, clear the fault back to us as No Fault Found.
3: We send the fault back to them.
4: They perform all diagnostics again and reconfirm all findings already stated here and previously by the BT team. As such, they say the only way forward should you as the customer want it, is to send out an engineer to the property.
When it gets to this stage, any further movement on the fault from BT side will result in charges if no problems are found.
As such, if order for me to proceed with any instruction you may provide, you will have to agree to the charges of (£169.20 - £144+vat).
These charges are applied for the following reasons.
1: If a fault is found to exists with your own equipment. Equipment includes any device you have attached to the phone line such as phones, faxes, modems and filters.
2: The engineer detaches your internal cabling and the problem goes away. This will prove the problem with be with your internal cabling.
3: The engineer comes out and declares the same findings as we have already put before you. That the line is running at optimal levels based on its length and quality.
The charges above are for the engineers time and whilst expensive, he will often do no more than what a alarm engineer or network installer can do for you, which will often be cheaper.
As such, I am happy to go against our recommendations here and give you the choice to proceed.
Let us know if you are happy to accept these charges and we will go ahead for you.