Postini/neptune would have caught it and dumped it in quarantine because of its sending behaviour. But AFAIK Plusnet are not using the neptune headers to tag these as spam.
We were incrementing the spam score where the X-pstn-neptune: qtine header was present as per the details
here.
This would seem to have been replaced by
X-pstn-neptune-cave-rslt: qtine. It's a 5 minute job to update the config but we need to be sure both headers serve the same purpose.
I don't think this is doing what's needed, Bob. Postini will send to quarantine any email that gets this result from neptune, however non-spammy it looks to the bulk filter. I think the neptune header(s) and the S: score are given for completely different reasons and shouldn't be mixed up in deciding whether an email is spam.
btw -- I've seen the old X-pstn-neptune-rslt: qtine header
since we started getting the new X-pstn-neptune-cave-rslt: qtine headers -- but I can't find any documentation about the latter either....
I have been getting some SPAM through where In the header I have got the subject line in twice but slightly different, with the message SPAM marked, see below:- (These have apparently come from myself to myself but my address has been spoofed).
That is odd, is anybody else seeing this?
Yes, I've seen one or two of these. Unfortunately, I deleted them, but the style was like this:
Subject: [-SPAM-]Some obnoxious medical piffle
Subject:S [-SPAM-]ome obnoxious medical piffle
Supporting Chris's comment why are emails marked with a blatant "x-pstn-xfilter: y" spam rating by Postini not being marked as Spam 1 (thus being detained in my online IMAP spam folder and not deposited in my Thunderbird Inbox) by Plusnet?
I have a theory about this and it may explain some of the disparity between headers as reported by mikeb. Bear in mind this is a
theory, so it will be interesting to see how things pan out. Whilst investigating
this problem we discovered that an error had led to a number of domains being present without many of the mail filtering options enabled. This seems to have been accounts added
*since*1st February. It
could be that these accounts did not have BSB switched on. I'm wondering whether or not some of the unusual headers people have been seeing are those that are present in mail that's normally blocked as Blatant Spam.
I wonder if you're right, Bob, about headers that include X-pstn-status: off and have other headers very abbreviated?
BUT I don't think your theory holds up with the perfectly well-documented X-pstn-xfilter: y header! Postini say these are in breach of what they call a Global Rule, but I can't remember why they get past the BSB....
I've been on the Postini Trial since before Christmas, and I'm getting some of these.