<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IronPort anti-spam migration FAQ</title>
	<atom:link href="http://community.plus.net/blog/2008/11/30/ironport-anti-spam-migration-faq/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://community.plus.net/blog/2008/11/30/ironport-anti-spam-migration-faq/</link>
	<description>News and Updates on the Community.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:19:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bob Pullen</title>
		<link>http://community.plus.net/blog/2008/11/30/ironport-anti-spam-migration-faq/comment-page-1/#comment-13073</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Pullen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 19:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://community.plus.net/?p=13030#comment-13073</guid>
		<description>Hi McNeill,

Have you raised a ticket? If not I&#039;d suggest you do this and include a copy of the return message that you&#039;re getting complete with the mail headers. We should then be able to assess why it&#039;s happening and hopefully sort it out for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi McNeill,</p>
<p>Have you raised a ticket? If not I'd suggest you do this and include a copy of the return message that you're getting complete with the mail headers. We should then be able to assess why it's happening and hopefully sort it out for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: McNeill</title>
		<link>http://community.plus.net/blog/2008/11/30/ironport-anti-spam-migration-faq/comment-page-1/#comment-13070</link>
		<dc:creator>McNeill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:47:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://community.plus.net/?p=13030#comment-13070</guid>
		<description>We are now unable to send emails to any of our correspondents who are on rambler.ru.  Whenever we try we are told that the spam filter won&#039;t let us and to contact you.  Please allow us to make contact with our correspondents using rambler.ru.  Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are now unable to send emails to any of our correspondents who are on rambler.ru.  Whenever we try we are told that the spam filter won't let us and to contact you.  Please allow us to make contact with our correspondents using rambler.ru.  Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ala Al-Khouri</title>
		<link>http://community.plus.net/blog/2008/11/30/ironport-anti-spam-migration-faq/comment-page-1/#comment-12513</link>
		<dc:creator>Ala Al-Khouri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:28:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://community.plus.net/?p=13030#comment-12513</guid>
		<description>Please help me confirm, or corretly answer the following:

A character string has been placed in the subject header of all emails that needs to be encrypted. This string is [LOCKIT] 
Enter the syntax that is needed to search for this string in the Condition Menu of the content filter. 

Answer:        subject == &quot;^\\[LOCKIT\\]&quot;       is this correct?

What command string from a sending MTA, tells a recieving MTA that a new mail transaction is about to occur and who it is coming from? 


Answer: HELO      is this correct


After an installation of an ESA, you need to verify that it will be able to access the Active Directory server my.ad.server.com. What CLI command string would you enter to verify this? 

Not sure what command tring i would Enter?


After installing an IronPort email appliance, you need to verify that it has SMTP access to your internal mail server smtp.myserver.com. You do this by logging into the appliance cli and entering a test string. Enter that string below. 

Not sure of the answer?


last question, the high lighted item what I think is correct only, but would love to confirm

A character string has been placed in the subject header of all email that needs to be encrypted. The string is [SECURE]. Which of the following options in the subject header menu of the content filter conditions must be chosen to trigger this filter?

(please confirm asnswers) select all that apply and we selected only 1 item.

(Select all that apply), i think contains (correct only) but I can be wrong

     Does not contain  
     Ends with  
     Does not begin with  
     Contains  (correct)
     Does not equal  
     Begins w
     Equals  
     Does not end with 


please help me with these questins, very much limited info out there and I am hoping you will be able to help.

thank you in advance
Ala Al-khouri
ala.al-khouri@hotmail.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please help me confirm, or corretly answer the following:</p>
<p>A character string has been placed in the subject header of all emails that needs to be encrypted. This string is [LOCKIT]<br />
Enter the syntax that is needed to search for this string in the Condition Menu of the content filter. </p>
<p>Answer:        subject == "^\\[LOCKIT\\]"       is this correct?</p>
<p>What command string from a sending MTA, tells a recieving MTA that a new mail transaction is about to occur and who it is coming from? </p>
<p>Answer: HELO      is this correct</p>
<p>After an installation of an ESA, you need to verify that it will be able to access the Active Directory server my.ad.server.com. What CLI command string would you enter to verify this? </p>
<p>Not sure what command tring i would Enter?</p>
<p>After installing an IronPort email appliance, you need to verify that it has SMTP access to your internal mail server smtp.myserver.com. You do this by logging into the appliance cli and entering a test string. Enter that string below. </p>
<p>Not sure of the answer?</p>
<p>last question, the high lighted item what I think is correct only, but would love to confirm</p>
<p>A character string has been placed in the subject header of all email that needs to be encrypted. The string is [SECURE]. Which of the following options in the subject header menu of the content filter conditions must be chosen to trigger this filter?</p>
<p>(please confirm asnswers) select all that apply and we selected only 1 item.</p>
<p>(Select all that apply), i think contains (correct only) but I can be wrong</p>
<p>     Does not contain<br />
     Ends with<br />
     Does not begin with<br />
     Contains  (correct)<br />
     Does not equal<br />
     Begins w<br />
     Equals<br />
     Does not end with </p>
<p>please help me with these questins, very much limited info out there and I am hoping you will be able to help.</p>
<p>thank you in advance<br />
Ala Al-khouri<br />
<a href="mailto:ala.al-khouri@hotmail.com">ala.al-khouri@hotmail.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Pullen</title>
		<link>http://community.plus.net/blog/2008/11/30/ironport-anti-spam-migration-faq/comment-page-1/#comment-10248</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Pullen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://community.plus.net/?p=13030#comment-10248</guid>
		<description>@tony, yes spam filtering is applied to mail that you download using pop3.

@Mark G, not on an individual basis it isn&#039;t. IronPort do have training addresses that you can forward emails to though and we&#039;ll probably decide to start forwarding email sent to our spam training addresses to them at some point. Have you checked the headers of this message though as there&#039;s a chance it came via Postini (we haven&#039;t switched it off yet).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@tony, yes spam filtering is applied to mail that you download using pop3.</p>
<p>@Mark G, not on an individual basis it isn't. IronPort do have training addresses that you can forward emails to though and we'll probably decide to start forwarding email sent to our spam training addresses to them at some point. Have you checked the headers of this message though as there's a chance it came via Postini (we haven't switched it off yet).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://community.plus.net/blog/2008/11/30/ironport-anti-spam-migration-faq/comment-page-1/#comment-9842</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 11:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://community.plus.net/?p=13030#comment-9842</guid>
		<description>Maybe Ironport are trying to tell you something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe Ironport are trying to tell you something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark G</title>
		<link>http://community.plus.net/blog/2008/11/30/ironport-anti-spam-migration-faq/comment-page-1/#comment-8469</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 00:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://community.plus.net/?p=13030#comment-8469</guid>
		<description>Is it possible to train the spam filter?

I got spam from Frontierpharmacies.com about some blue pills.  Clearly spam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it possible to train the spam filter?</p>
<p>I got spam from Frontierpharmacies.com about some blue pills.  Clearly spam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tony</title>
		<link>http://community.plus.net/blog/2008/11/30/ironport-anti-spam-migration-faq/comment-page-1/#comment-8453</link>
		<dc:creator>tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 22:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://community.plus.net/?p=13030#comment-8453</guid>
		<description>i download my email via pop3 does spam filtering have any effect on emails downloaded in this way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i download my email via pop3 does spam filtering have any effect on emails downloaded in this way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jayne</title>
		<link>http://community.plus.net/blog/2008/11/30/ironport-anti-spam-migration-faq/comment-page-1/#comment-8424</link>
		<dc:creator>Jayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 23:56:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://community.plus.net/?p=13030#comment-8424</guid>
		<description>Ironports... A great choice, we implemented Ironports a couple of years ago when the Unix systems could no longer cope.  A year ago, we were getting 1 million mails a day, the ironports stop practically all of our SPAM, which is a staggering 98%.  A very robost and strong SPAM, Content filtering, virus solution... (despite the costly price to buy:)  We are virtually virus free with this solution.

Was pleased to hear of this solution...

It is a shame that those who are so quick to critise this solution and think your intend is to break what is perceived as a fixed solution don&#039;t really appreciate the time and human effort it has taken to help rid us all of a problem created by a small number of destructive people.

Well done:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ironports... A great choice, we implemented Ironports a couple of years ago when the Unix systems could no longer cope.  A year ago, we were getting 1 million mails a day, the ironports stop practically all of our SPAM, which is a staggering 98%.  A very robost and strong SPAM, Content filtering, virus solution... (despite the costly price to buy:)  We are virtually virus free with this solution.</p>
<p>Was pleased to hear of this solution...</p>
<p>It is a shame that those who are so quick to critise this solution and think your intend is to break what is perceived as a fixed solution don't really appreciate the time and human effort it has taken to help rid us all of a problem created by a small number of destructive people.</p>
<p>Well done:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Pullen</title>
		<link>http://community.plus.net/blog/2008/11/30/ironport-anti-spam-migration-faq/comment-page-1/#comment-8375</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Pullen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 08:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://community.plus.net/?p=13030#comment-8375</guid>
		<description>@Simon Waldron, I&#039;m sorry to hear that you&#039;re having difficulty with the messages forwarded from your hosting provider.

An internal problem is open regarding this (ref: 54522), however the problem is due to the reputation of Demon&#039;s mail servers. From what I can tell they have four that are used for domain forwarding:

213.253.179.5 - Good
213.253.179.6 - Good
213.253.179.7 - Poor (Critical)
213.253.179.8 - Poor (Very High)

The value after each IP address is the servers current reputation. As you can see, some of them are really bad - http://www.senderbase.org/senderbase_queries/rep_lookup?search_name=213.253.179.7&amp;action%3ASearch=Search

This doesn&#039;t seem all that dissimilar to the problems we&#039;ve had with uk2.net in the past (although the senderbase reputation of their servers wasn&#039;t quite as bad as this).

We&#039;ll try getting in touch with Demon (have you queried this with them yourselves?), and assess whether or not we can put any measures in place at this side to sort this out for you.

In the meantime, you might want to consider switching spam protection off on your account. This would result in your email completely bypassing the spam filters (but would also result in an increase in the volume of junk email that gets through to you).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Simon Waldron, I'm sorry to hear that you're having difficulty with the messages forwarded from your hosting provider.</p>
<p>An internal problem is open regarding this (ref: 54522), however the problem is due to the reputation of Demon's mail servers. From what I can tell they have four that are used for domain forwarding:</p>
<p>213.253.179.5 - Good<br />
213.253.179.6 - Good<br />
213.253.179.7 - Poor (Critical)<br />
213.253.179.8 - Poor (Very High)</p>
<p>The value after each IP address is the servers current reputation. As you can see, some of them are really bad - <a href="http://www.senderbase.org/senderbase_queries/rep_lookup?search_name=213.253.179.7&#038;action%3ASearch=Search" rel="nofollow">http://www.senderbase.org/senderbase_queries/rep_lookup?search_name=213.253.179.7&#038;action%3ASearch=Search</a></p>
<p>This doesn't seem all that dissimilar to the problems we've had with uk2.net in the past (although the senderbase reputation of their servers wasn't quite as bad as this).</p>
<p>We'll try getting in touch with Demon (have you queried this with them yourselves?), and assess whether or not we can put any measures in place at this side to sort this out for you.</p>
<p>In the meantime, you might want to consider switching spam protection off on your account. This would result in your email completely bypassing the spam filters (but would also result in an increase in the volume of junk email that gets through to you).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Waldron</title>
		<link>http://community.plus.net/blog/2008/11/30/ironport-anti-spam-migration-faq/comment-page-1/#comment-8359</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Waldron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 16:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://community.plus.net/?p=13030#comment-8359</guid>
		<description>In response to the comment by Kenneth Smyth; I am appaled at the &#039;head in the sand&#039; approach of PlusNet. They keep telling me that Ironport is a third party system which blocks emails from &#039;known spammers&#039;. In my case (and hundreds of others) my domain name is hosted by DSVR (Demon) with email forwarding to my PlusNet email, but Ironport is blocking all email from DSVR. Consequently I have had no email for 4 days and have spent hours on the phone trying to get the issue resolved, currently with no success.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In response to the comment by Kenneth Smyth; I am appaled at the 'head in the sand' approach of PlusNet. They keep telling me that Ironport is a third party system which blocks emails from 'known spammers'. In my case (and hundreds of others) my domain name is hosted by DSVR (Demon) with email forwarding to my PlusNet email, but Ironport is blocking all email from DSVR. Consequently I have had no email for 4 days and have spent hours on the phone trying to get the issue resolved, currently with no success.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
