<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Google Algorithm Is Changing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://community.plus.net/blog/2008/01/02/the-google-algorithm-is-changing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://community.plus.net/blog/2008/01/02/the-google-algorithm-is-changing/</link>
	<description>News and Updates on the Community.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:19:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: bobp</title>
		<link>http://community.plus.net/blog/2008/01/02/the-google-algorithm-is-changing/comment-page-1/#comment-315</link>
		<dc:creator>bobp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 10:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://community.plus.net/blog/2008/01/02/the-google-algorithm-is-changing/#comment-315</guid>
		<description>If the above is too cryptic see http://www.google.com/technology/pigeonrank.html

Although Google has changed its algorithm about 6 months ago to catch recent news and blogs these are not persistent in the listings.  Part of the reason in the example given by GOS is the very specific search term.  Of course the more general article in Wikipedia will not come out top.  These transient results catch what are hot topics, but already they are fading.  Just repeating the search GOS highlighted shows how wikipedia is moving back to top spot</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the above is too cryptic see <a href="http://www.google.com/technology/pigeonrank.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/technology/pigeonrank.html</a></p>
<p>Although Google has changed its algorithm about 6 months ago to catch recent news and blogs these are not persistent in the listings.  Part of the reason in the example given by GOS is the very specific search term.  Of course the more general article in Wikipedia will not come out top.  These transient results catch what are hot topics, but already they are fading.  Just repeating the search GOS highlighted shows how wikipedia is moving back to top spot</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobp</title>
		<link>http://community.plus.net/blog/2008/01/02/the-google-algorithm-is-changing/comment-page-1/#comment-314</link>
		<dc:creator>bobp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 10:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://community.plus.net/blog/2008/01/02/the-google-algorithm-is-changing/#comment-314</guid>
		<description>This is probably an effect of the pigeons having a really good party at new year. &lt;a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is probably an effect of the pigeons having a really good party at new year. <a></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
