<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shrinking the market</title>
	<atom:link href="http://community.plus.net/blog/2007/12/17/shrinking-the-market/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://community.plus.net/blog/2007/12/17/shrinking-the-market/</link>
	<description>News and Updates on the Community.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 16:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tamlyn</title>
		<link>http://community.plus.net/blog/2007/12/17/shrinking-the-market/#comment-735</link>
		<dc:creator>Tamlyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 10:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://community.plus.net/blog/2007/12/17/shrinking-the-market/#comment-735</guid>
		<description>It's called 'Knol', more info here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knol (irony noted)

I can't see this working myself. The model is more like Squidoo than Wikipedia and lacks the benefit of the 'wisdom of the crowds'.

 I'm also not comfortable with the concept of google changing the ranking algorithms to favour its own properties either. They say they won't do it but I have to admit there's a strong possibility they will.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's called 'Knol', more info here <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knol" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knol</a> (irony noted)</p>
<p>I can't see this working myself. The model is more like Squidoo than Wikipedia and lacks the benefit of the 'wisdom of the crowds'.</p>
<p> I'm also not comfortable with the concept of google changing the ranking algorithms to favour its own properties either. They say they won't do it but I have to admit there's a strong possibility they will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
