<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Update on Plans for 2007</title>
	<atom:link href="http://community.plus.net/blog/2007/09/02/77/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://community.plus.net/blog/2007/09/02/77/</link>
	<description>News and Updates on the Community.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 16:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Duncan</title>
		<link>http://community.plus.net/blog/2007/09/02/77/#comment-535</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 23:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://community.plus.net/blog/2007/09/02/77/#comment-535</guid>
		<description>Well I can assume that this update is now 12 months old, and we should be due a 2008 update, is there any news re the Home Hub?

I have a BT Home Hub and think it’s a great bit kit, but in its standard format it is locked to BT Broadband, I have managed to update the firmware so that I can use it with my Plus.Net account but in doing so I have lost all the nice VoIP &#38; Hub Phone functionality.

Hopefully they’ll be releasing this soon, when they do will Plus.NET provide a firmware update to allow existing owners to upgrade their hubs so they can be used with Plus.Net (even if the update is locked to either Plus.Net or BT) ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I can assume that this update is now 12 months old, and we should be due a 2008 update, is there any news re the Home Hub?</p>
<p>I have a BT Home Hub and think it’s a great bit kit, but in its standard format it is locked to BT Broadband, I have managed to update the firmware so that I can use it with my Plus.Net account but in doing so I have lost all the nice VoIP &amp; Hub Phone functionality.</p>
<p>Hopefully they’ll be releasing this soon, when they do will Plus.NET provide a firmware update to allow existing owners to upgrade their hubs so they can be used with Plus.Net (even if the update is locked to either Plus.Net or BT) ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bascule</title>
		<link>http://community.plus.net/blog/2007/09/02/77/#comment-245</link>
		<dc:creator>Bascule</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 13:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://community.plus.net/blog/2007/09/02/77/#comment-245</guid>
		<description>I too am waiting eagerly (and a little impatiently) for the IPTV offering. Virgin Media is looking increasingly tempting. Loyalty has it's limits!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too am waiting eagerly (and a little impatiently) for the IPTV offering. Virgin Media is looking increasingly tempting. Loyalty has it's limits!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chuckster</title>
		<link>http://community.plus.net/blog/2007/09/02/77/#comment-217</link>
		<dc:creator>chuckster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 16:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://community.plus.net/blog/2007/09/02/77/#comment-217</guid>
		<description>I was looking into BT Vision and was seriously considering whether to jump to BT Broadband so that I could access this service.
It just so happened that the loyalty offer appeared in my Inbox, added with that the superb reliability and performance I've had over the years from PlusNet I decided to stay.
I'm hoping that, with the tie-up between PlusNet and BT that the Vision product is introduced within the not-too-distant future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was looking into BT Vision and was seriously considering whether to jump to BT Broadband so that I could access this service.<br />
It just so happened that the loyalty offer appeared in my Inbox, added with that the superb reliability and performance I've had over the years from PlusNet I decided to stay.<br />
I'm hoping that, with the tie-up between PlusNet and BT that the Vision product is introduced within the not-too-distant future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: garetha</title>
		<link>http://community.plus.net/blog/2007/09/02/77/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>garetha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 08:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://community.plus.net/blog/2007/09/02/77/#comment-75</guid>
		<description>I was looking forward to BT Fusion and thought that it would have come a little bit sooner, now that the partnership with BT has been made.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was looking forward to BT Fusion and thought that it would have come a little bit sooner, now that the partnership with BT has been made.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stevebosman</title>
		<link>http://community.plus.net/blog/2007/09/02/77/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>stevebosman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 08:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://community.plus.net/blog/2007/09/02/77/#comment-74</guid>
		<description>Firefox does interpret alt attributes, but quite correctly it understands the difference between alt and title. The alt attribute is used if an image is not being displayed and the title attribute will be used for tooltips. It is good practice to provide both and then both IE and firefox will be happy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firefox does interpret alt attributes, but quite correctly it understands the difference between alt and title. The alt attribute is used if an image is not being displayed and the title attribute will be used for tooltips. It is good practice to provide both and then both IE and firefox will be happy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IanW</title>
		<link>http://community.plus.net/blog/2007/09/02/77/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>IanW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 08:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://community.plus.net/blog/2007/09/02/77/#comment-73</guid>
		<description>No mention of Usenet?  But it went through a radical change in 2007 didn't it?  You outsourced it?  It must have taken quite a bit of management time to negotiate the deal and techy time to implement it.  Has it worked?  Have usenet-related issues settled down to a lower rate than before the migration?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No mention of Usenet?  But it went through a radical change in 2007 didn't it?  You outsourced it?  It must have taken quite a bit of management time to negotiate the deal and techy time to implement it.  Has it worked?  Have usenet-related issues settled down to a lower rate than before the migration?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xon</title>
		<link>http://community.plus.net/blog/2007/09/02/77/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>xon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 14:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://community.plus.net/blog/2007/09/02/77/#comment-71</guid>
		<description>Sorry for the delayed reply but yes I am using a Firefox browser. I was unaware that FF does not interpret alt tags! 
Never mind, maybe another more effective signal or indicator could be selected?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry for the delayed reply but yes I am using a Firefox browser. I was unaware that FF does not interpret alt tags!<br />
Never mind, maybe another more effective signal or indicator could be selected?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jelv</title>
		<link>http://community.plus.net/blog/2007/09/02/77/#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>jelv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 13:56:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://community.plus.net/blog/2007/09/02/77/#comment-70</guid>
		<description>The browser which is apparently used by the majority of users of this site: http://community.plus.net/forum/index.php?topic=181.0

Whatever you do should work for FF users.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The browser which is apparently used by the majority of users of this site: <a href="http://community.plus.net/forum/index.php?topic=181.0" rel="nofollow">http://community.plus.net/forum/index.php?topic=181.0</a></p>
<p>Whatever you do should work for FF users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin</title>
		<link>http://community.plus.net/blog/2007/09/02/77/#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 08:47:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://community.plus.net/blog/2007/09/02/77/#comment-69</guid>
		<description>The ALT attribute is present on the images already. You aren't using Firefox by any chance are you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ALT attribute is present on the images already. You aren't using Firefox by any chance are you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chrisc</title>
		<link>http://community.plus.net/blog/2007/09/02/77/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>chrisc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 08:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://community.plus.net/blog/2007/09/02/77/#comment-68</guid>
		<description>The traffic lights should have been tagged and it is in the html... I'll investigate why this hasn't worked and get it fixed as soon as possible.

Thanks for the feedback.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The traffic lights should have been tagged and it is in the html... I'll investigate why this hasn't worked and get it fixed as soon as possible.</p>
<p>Thanks for the feedback.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
