<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Logged Faults Process Update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://community.plus.net/blog/2007/05/21/logged-faults-process-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://community.plus.net/blog/2007/05/21/logged-faults-process-update/</link>
	<description>News and Updates on the Community.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 00:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Customer Support Centre - Blog Archive &#187; More Fault Improvments</title>
		<link>http://community.plus.net/blog/2007/05/21/logged-faults-process-update/#comment-1070</link>
		<dc:creator>The Customer Support Centre - Blog Archive &#187; More Fault Improvments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 17:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://community.plus.net/blog/2007/05/21/logged-faults-process-update/#comment-1070</guid>
		<description>[...] on from Keiths May update on the Logged Faults Process, we have pressed forward and continued to drive this process and its [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on from Keiths May update on the Logged Faults Process, we have pressed forward and continued to drive this process and its [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Be3G</title>
		<link>http://community.plus.net/blog/2007/05/21/logged-faults-process-update/#comment-1069</link>
		<dc:creator>Be3G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 18:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://community.plus.net/blog/2007/05/21/logged-faults-process-update/#comment-1069</guid>
		<description>Ahh fair enough - I got the impression that the statement about PN being below average was just taken from the figures. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahh fair enough - I got the impression that the statement about PN being below average was just taken from the figures. <img src='http://community.plus.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://community.plus.net/blog/2007/05/21/logged-faults-process-update/#comment-1068</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 16:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://community.plus.net/blog/2007/05/21/logged-faults-process-update/#comment-1068</guid>
		<description>That's an extremely good pedantic comment ;)

However, if it were the case BT wouldn't have told us that we were below the average which would lead me to suspect that they were referring to 0.10%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That's an extremely good pedantic comment <img src='http://community.plus.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
However, if it were the case BT wouldn't have told us that we were below the average which would lead me to suspect that they were referring to 0.10%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Be3G</title>
		<link>http://community.plus.net/blog/2007/05/21/logged-faults-process-update/#comment-1067</link>
		<dc:creator>Be3G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 15:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://community.plus.net/blog/2007/05/21/logged-faults-process-update/#comment-1067</guid>
		<description>Just one pedantic point/thought: if BT's published fault rate says '0.1%' and not '0.10%', then PlusNet could be above or below that - 0.1% could mean anything from 0.05% to 0.14999999%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just one pedantic point/thought: if BT's published fault rate says '0.1%' and not '0.10%', then PlusNet could be above or below that - 0.1% could mean anything from 0.05% to 0.14999999%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
